GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — WS should be authenticated with ACL · Issue #1 · nodeSolidServer/node-solid-ws

WS should be authenticated with ACL #1

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Open
Open
WS should be authenticated with ACL#1
Copy link
Labels
triageIssues that need team reviewIssues that need team review

Description

@nicola
nicola
opened on May 10, 2016
Issue body actions

Was nodeSolidServer/node-solid-server#143

Activity

  1. michielbdejong commented on Jan 17, 2019

    @michielbdejong
    michielbdejong
    on Jan 17, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    The client should probably provide the user credentials in the upgrade request.
    Connecting should probably never fail.
    Notifications should only be sent to authenticated users who are subscribed to a (parent-)folder containing that item, and currently have read-access to the changed item.
    Maybe, subscribing to a folder to which the user has no read access should already fail with an error if the user does not have read access to the folder at that time, since the user would not receive any notifications unless the ACLs change during the period the WebSocket connection is active.

  2. michielbdejong commented on Jan 21, 2019

    @michielbdejong
    michielbdejong
    on Jan 21, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    As a first step, I'll try to restrict updates to public files when connected without credentials.

  3. kjetilk
    added
    triageIssues that need team reviewIssues that need team review
    on Jan 21, 2019
  4. michielbdejong commented on Sep 28, 2020

    @michielbdejong
    michielbdejong
    on Sep 28, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    I'm now (finally) working on a fix for this, see https://github.com/solid/specification/issues/52#issuecomment-682491952

    I plan to finish this in October 2020 as part of my EU-funded solid-crud-tests milestone (will update this comment if that estimate changes).

  5. michielbdejong commented on Oct 14, 2020

    @michielbdejong
    michielbdejong
    on Oct 14, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    @jaxoncreed as discussed in the Solid OS call today, would it make sense to add a WebSockets client into ISCAJ? How can we coordinate that between the two of us?

  6. michielbdejong commented on Oct 14, 2020

    @michielbdejong
    michielbdejong
    on Oct 14, 2020
    Member
    More actions

    CC @Vinnl

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    triageIssues that need team reviewIssues that need team review

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.