GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Document async_hooks types purposes · Issue #511 · nodejs/diagnostics

Document async_hooks types purposes #511

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
Closed
Document async_hooks types purposes#511
Copy link

Description

@RafaelGSS
RafaelGSS
opened on Nov 5, 2021
Issue body actions

I'm working on a profiler tool that uses async_hooks to trace events, however, I'm a bit lost to understand the reason for each type of resource.

In the documentation, we have the list of types: https://nodejs.org/api/async_hooks.html#type but there is no description of each event.

Not sure where I should open this issue, if you think that it's more suitable at the node repository feel free to move.

Activity

  1. RafaelGSS
    added
    diag-agenda
    on Dec 22, 2021
  2. RafaelGSS commented on Jan 25, 2022

    @RafaelGSS
    RafaelGSS
    on Jan 25, 2022
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    Currently, there are 2 suggestions:

    • Generate the types of documentation based on the definition (we aren't sure if we want to it)
    • Improve the documentation
      • Update the documentation to explicitly says to not rely too much on the types, because it might change arbitrarily.
    Reacted by Gireesh Punathil and Tony Gorez
  3. RafaelGSS
    removed
    diag-agenda
    on Jan 25, 2022
  4. tony-go commented on Jan 29, 2022

    @tony-go
    tony-go
    on Jan 29, 2022
    Member
    More actions

    Hi @RafaelGSS 👋

    Do you plan to raise a pull request for the second point?

    I can do it otherwise :) Let me know ^^

    Reacted by Gireesh Punathil
  5. RafaelGSS commented on Jan 30, 2022

    @RafaelGSS
    RafaelGSS
    on Jan 30, 2022
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    Go ahead :)

    Reacted by Gireesh Punathil
  6. RafaelGSS
    closed this as completedon Feb 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.