GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — perf_hooks: fix for redundant validation check for number by pluris · Pull Request #49547 · nodejs/node

Conversation

@pluris

@pluris pluris commented Sep 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

It has been modified so that Type and range can be checked only with validateNumber.
Below is a modified reference to a similar case.

Refs: #45770

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
pluris
perf_hooks: fix for redundant validation check for number
cecbbe5
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Sep 8, 2023
deokjinkim
deokjinkim reviewed Sep 8, 2023
View reviewed changes
Comment thread lib/internal/histogram.js
validateNumber(percentile, 'percentile');
if (NumberIsNaN(percentile) || percentile <= 0 || percentile > 100)
throw new ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE('percentile', '> 0 && <= 100', percentile);
validateNumber(percentile, 'percentile', 1, 100);

@deokjinkim deokjinkim Sep 8, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried this approach before, but all the numbers between 0 and 1 are not allowed any more with this PR.
This(#45772 (comment)) is previous discussion.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

pluris reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

@pluris pluris Sep 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@deokjinkim Thank you for explaining the history. I'll close it.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@pluris pluris closed this Sep 8, 2023
@pluris
pluris deleted the fix/histogram_validate_number branch November 8, 2023 02:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@deokjinkim deokjinkim deokjinkim left review comments

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@pluris @deokjinkim @nodejs-github-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.