GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — test: add EOVERFLOW as an allowed error by abmusse · Pull Request #50128 · nodejs/node

Conversation

@abmusse

@abmusse abmusse commented Oct 10, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

in test-fs-read-promises-position-validation.mjs

As stated in #50054

This looks like an oversight as
test-fs-read-position-validation.mjs includes
EOVERFLOW as an allowed error.

Fixes #50054

CC @nodejs/platform-ibmi

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

bricss reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Oct 10, 2023
@abmusse
test: add EOVERFLOW as an allowed error
a5f5257
in test-fs-read-promises-position-validation.mjs

As stated in #50054

This looks like an oversight as
test-fs-read-position-validation.mjs includes
EOVERFLOW as an allowed error.

Fixes #50054
lpinca
lpinca approved these changes Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
richardlau
richardlau approved these changes Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
@richardlau richardlau added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. Only starts once the PR has an approving review. label Oct 10, 2023
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. Only starts once the PR has an approving review. label Oct 10, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot

nodejs-github-bot commented Oct 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/54675/

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

anonrig
anonrig approved these changes Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2023
CI Reliability 2023-10-11 nodejs/reliability#690
Open
30 tasks
@nodejs-github-bot

nodejs-github-bot commented Oct 11, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/54687/

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@nodejs-github-bot

nodejs-github-bot commented Oct 11, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/54703/

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@richardlau richardlau added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Oct 11, 2023
@richardlau

richardlau commented Oct 11, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-ibmi/1325/ shows the test now passes with this PR. The test-runner-cli-concurrency failure there will be addressed by #50108.

abmusse reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Oct 12, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit f0e720a into nodejs:main Oct 12, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot

nodejs-github-bot commented Oct 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in f0e720a

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@abmusse
abmusse deleted the fix-parallel-test-fs-read-promises-position-validation branch October 12, 2023 19:14
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2023
2023-10-17, Version 21.0.0 (Current) #49870
Merged
@targos targos added dont-land-on-v18.x labels Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lpinca lpinca lpinca approved these changes
@anonrig anonrig anonrig approved these changes
@richardlau richardlau richardlau approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test: parallel/test-fs-read-promises-position-validation fails on IBM i

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

6 participants

@abmusse @nodejs-github-bot @richardlau @lpinca @anonrig @targos
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.