GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — fix: add auto-labeling for trusted PRs and improve Claude code review workflow by pronskiy · Pull Request #74 · php-debugger/php-debugger Conversation
Member
The problem is that if a pull request is coming from a fork, then secrets are not available. If you make them available by switching to
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Shouldn't this workflow depend on the other workflow? Otherwise by the time this one runs the PR may not have been labelled yet. Maybe it is best to move the labelling job here and make this workflow a two job workflow, with the second one depending on the first one
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Good point 🙏
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions…auto-labeling and review gate logic
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I asked claude if there was a way to check if the PR creator was a privileged user so that we did not need to hardcode our usernames here and it suggested this code: Maybe we should try this?
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
carlos-granados
approved these changes
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Approved with a suggestion
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions…hor_association instead of hardcoded usernames Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |