GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Resource Leaks in processing/app/Util.java by SalmaneKhalili · Pull Request #1436 · processing/processing4 Conversation
Contributor
This PR add a simple implementation of what was suggested in #1432, at the moment it was only applied to unzip, i should be able to do the same for the rest of the methods mentioned in the issue, but id like to have feedback on the current way im going about it.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsto put the test in the appropriate directory, id have to java files to grade build configs, because it currently only checks for kotlin tests. create a temp zip file > create a destination that is a file not a directory (guaranteed exception) -> unzip throws ioexception because it expects a directory not a file -> catch it -> check if the zip file is still open -> if true == leak.
tychedelia
reviewed
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Looks good! We should just either gate or remove the test.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Probably better to not have a test than a platform specific test.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Done!
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsIve also removed the test since its OS specific, and new code is supposed to be in kotlin.
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
catilac
approved these changes
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |