GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Don't wait for allowed_failures on travis builds? · Issue #19 · python/core-workflow

Don't wait for allowed_failures on travis builds? #19

Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Closed
Don't wait for allowed_failures on travis builds?#19
Copy link

Description

@dstufft
dstufft
opened on Feb 11, 2017
Issue body actions

Currently we have a matrix item in Travis for allowed_failure. This is fine to do, but travis won't mark the build successful or failed until that job has finished even though it won't ultimately effect the outcome. One option we can do is to set:

matrix:
  fast_finish: true

Which will tell travis to report the status of the job as soon as all of the non allowed failure builds are done, while still running the allowed failure build.

Reacted by Zachary Ware, Brett Cannon, Berker Peksag and Inada Naoki

Activity

  1. brettcannon commented on Feb 11, 2017

    @brettcannon
    brettcannon
    on Feb 11, 2017
    Member
    More actions

    Fine by me, although knowing the coverage can be useful (but I suspect people will wait to see that report anyway). So I say submit a PR! 😄

  2. brettcannon commented on Feb 15, 2017

    @brettcannon
    brettcannon
    on Feb 15, 2017
    Member
    More actions

    Documentation of the configuration value: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build#Fast-Finishing

  3. dstufft
    closed this as completedon Feb 15, 2017
  4. brettcannon commented on Feb 15, 2017

    @brettcannon
    brettcannon
    on Feb 15, 2017
    Member
    More actions

    Thanks for merging and closing, @dstufft !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.