GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Should we allow relative includes? (i.e. #include "../_ssl.h") · Issue #121223 · python/cpython

Should we allow relative includes? (i.e. #include "../_ssl.h") #121223

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed as not planned
Closed as not planned
Should we allow relative includes? (i.e. #include "../_ssl.h")#121223
Copy link
Labels
buildThe build process and cross-buildThe build process and cross-buildextension-modulesC modules in the Modules dirC modules in the Modules dirinterpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)type-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement

Description

@skirpichev
skirpichev
opened on Jul 1, 2024
Issue body actions

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

          Can we avoid the relative include? They tend to produce problems further down the road.

Originally posted by @erlend-aasland in #120894 (comment)

There are few more examples:

$ git grep '#include .*\.\.\/'
Include/internal/mimalloc/mimalloc/track.h:#include "../src/prim/windows/etw.h"
Modules/_blake2/blake2b_impl.c:#include "../hashlib.h"
Modules/_blake2/blake2s_impl.c:#include "../hashlib.h"
Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:#include "../_complex.h"          // complex
Modules/_hacl/internal/Hacl_Hash_MD5.h:#include "../Hacl_Hash_MD5.h"
Modules/_hacl/internal/Hacl_Hash_SHA1.h:#include "../Hacl_Hash_SHA1.h"
Modules/_hacl/internal/Hacl_Hash_SHA2.h:#include "../Hacl_Hash_SHA2.h"
Modules/_hacl/internal/Hacl_Hash_SHA3.h:#include "../Hacl_Hash_SHA3.h"
Modules/_ssl/cert.c:#include "../_ssl.h"
Modules/_ssl/misc.c:#include "../_ssl.h"
Modules/_testinternalcapi/set.c:#include "../_testcapi/util.h"  // NULLABLE, RETURN_INT
Objects/mimalloc/prim/osx/prim.c:#include "../unix/prim.c"
Parser/lexer/lexer.c:#include "../tokenizer/helpers.h"
Parser/tokenizer/file_tokenizer.c:#include "../lexer/state.h"
Parser/tokenizer/file_tokenizer.c:#include "../lexer/lexer.h"
Parser/tokenizer/file_tokenizer.c:#include "../lexer/buffer.h"
Parser/tokenizer/helpers.c:#include "../lexer/state.h"
Parser/tokenizer/helpers.h:#include "../lexer/state.h"
Parser/tokenizer/readline_tokenizer.c:#include "../lexer/lexer.h"
Parser/tokenizer/readline_tokenizer.c:#include "../lexer/state.h"
Parser/tokenizer/readline_tokenizer.c:#include "../lexer/buffer.h"
Parser/tokenizer/string_tokenizer.c:#include "../lexer/state.h"
Parser/tokenizer/utf8_tokenizer.c:#include "../lexer/state.h"
Python/Python-tokenize.c:#include "../Parser/lexer/state.h"
Python/Python-tokenize.c:#include "../Parser/lexer/lexer.h"
Python/Python-tokenize.c:#include "../Parser/tokenizer/tokenizer.h"
Python/Python-tokenize.c:#include "../Parser/pegen.h"      // _PyPegen_byte_offset_to_character_offset()

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

No response

Activity

  1. skirpichev
    added
    type-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement
    on Jul 1, 2024
  2. erlend-aasland
    added
    buildThe build process and cross-buildThe build process and cross-build
    on Jul 1, 2024
  3. kumaraditya303 commented on Jul 3, 2024

    @kumaraditya303
    kumaraditya303
    on Jul 3, 2024
    Contributor
    More actions

    Note that mimalloc is copied from upstream, I don't think we should be changing it here.

    Reacted by Erlend E. Aasland
  4. picnixz
    added
    interpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)
    extension-modulesC modules in the Modules dirC modules in the Modules dir
    on Jul 15, 2025
  5. picnixz commented on Jul 15, 2025

    @picnixz
    picnixz
    on Jul 15, 2025
    Member
    More actions

    Same for HACL*.

  6. vstinner commented on Aug 5, 2025

    @vstinner
    vstinner
    on Aug 5, 2025
    Member
    More actions

    It seems like we have multiple C files using relative includes, and I'm not aware of any practical issue, so I suggest to simply closing this issue.

  7. skirpichev
    added
    pendingThe issue will be closed if no feedback is providedThe issue will be closed if no feedback is provided
    on Aug 5, 2025
  8. skirpichev commented on Aug 5, 2025

    @skirpichev
    skirpichev
    on Aug 5, 2025
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    @erlend-aasland, could you more elaborate about problems, mentioned in your comment?

  9. erlend-aasland commented on Aug 6, 2025

    @erlend-aasland
    erlend-aasland
    on Aug 6, 2025
    Contributor
    More actions

    @erlend-aasland, could you more elaborate about problems, mentioned in your comment?

    I don't remember the reason for raising this issue. I'm fine with closing the issue, as Victor suggests.

  10. skirpichev
    removed
    pendingThe issue will be closed if no feedback is providedThe issue will be closed if no feedback is provided
    on Aug 6, 2025
  11. skirpichev
    closed this as not plannedon Aug 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    buildThe build process and cross-buildThe build process and cross-buildextension-modulesC modules in the Modules dirC modules in the Modules dirinterpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)type-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.