GeezerVison is showing github.com — Prefix search is filesystem-centric · Issue #41525 · python/cpython
Prefix search is filesystem-centric #41525Description
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2005-02-04.22:16:00.000>
labels = ['interpreter-core', 'type-feature']
title = 'Prefix search is filesystem-centric'
updated_at = <Date 2019-12-19.00:29:24.734>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/holdenweb' bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2019-12-19.00:29:24.734>
actor = 'brett.cannon'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Interpreter Core']
creation = <Date 2005-02-04.22:16:00.000>
creator = 'holdenweb'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 1116520
keywords = []
message_count = 12.0
messages = ['60644', '113379', '113406', '154337', '154370', '222630', '283964', '283965', '284001', '284005', '284006', '284011']
nosy_count = 10.0
nosy_names = ['holdenweb', 'terry.reedy', 'gregory.p.smith', 'ncoghlan', 'carljm', 'eric.araujo', 'eric.snow', 'steve.dower', 'superluser', 'patriki']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'low'
resolution = None
stage = 'test needed'
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue1116520'
versions = ['Python 3.6'] Activityholdenweb commented on Feb 4, 2005 With the introduction of zipimport I experimented to
determine how much of the standard library could be
provided in zip format.
I discovered that I could entirely remove the standard
library, replacing it with /lib/python24.zip, with the
following caveats (this is under Cygwin, where /usr/lib
appears to be a loopback mount of /lib: paths will
differ on other platforms):
-
The /lib/python2.4/lib-dynload directory had to be
copied to the /lib directory to make zlib available to
zipimport;
-
The interpreter now produced three error messages:
"Could not find platform independent libraries <prefix>"
"Could not find platform dependent libraries <exec_prefix>"
"Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to <prefix>[:<exec_prefix>]"
With the move towards esoteric import mechanisms it
seems that the searches for os.py in the filesystem
might no longer be an appropriate way to start
executing the interpreter.
Should some import hook API be available to determine
whether standard libraries are available without
actually importing anything? terryjreedy commented on Aug 9, 2010 Is this request still relevant for 3.2? holdenweb commented on Aug 9, 2010 Personally I think it's just as relevant as it always was, particularly with the introduction of importlib, but Brett will have a more informed opinion. I won't be surprised if this issue is closed as wontfix. ncoghlan commented on Feb 26, 2012 Yeah, I'm pretty sure the bootstrap mechanism needs to be able to get hold of os.py directly so it can be injected into the importlib._bootstrap namespace.
However, it may be worth figuring out and documenting the bare minimum that has to exist on the filesystem in order for importlib to get going.
It's even possible that Brett freezes enough into the interpreter binary that the required set has shrunk to zero. brettcannon commented on Feb 26, 2012 Importlib actually requires no files from disk; everything that is required for importlib are built-in modules or are constants in importlib itself (e.g. os.sep). So technically this should be doable since my bootstrap work freezes importlib itself. BreamoreBoy commented on Jul 9, 2014 Is this something that we could get into 3.5? iselind commented on Dec 24, 2016 How much smaller would the stdlib for 3.5 become if you compress it with zip? iselind commented on Dec 24, 2016 What about the performance penalty for zipping stdlib? is it significant?
When would you like to zip stdlib? For embedded systems with limited disk
space?
Patrik Iselind
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Patrik Iselind <[email protected]>
wrote:
Patrik Iselind added the comment:
How much smaller would the stdlib for 3.5 become if you compress it with
zip?
----------
nosy: +patriki
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1116520\>
brettcannon commented on Dec 25, 2016 Originally zip file importing was faster than standard importing from disk because of the fewer stat calls, but importlib caches such things so I don't know if it's still beneficial. As for space savings, I have no idea; you can try zipping the files yourself to find out the space savings. iselind commented on Dec 25, 2016 Is it enough to include everything in the Lib folder, excluding
__pycache__, site-packages and the test folder in Lib? Would that be
representative enough?
Patrik Iselind
Den 2016-12-25 kl. 17:31, skrev Brett Cannon:
Brett Cannon added the comment:
Originally zip file importing was faster than standard importing from disk because of the fewer stat calls, but importlib caches such things so I don't know if it's still beneficial. As for space savings, I have no idea; you can try zipping the files yourself to find out the space savings.
----------
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1116520\>
holdenweb commented on Dec 25, 2016 Don't forget that the built-in modules may need to be available before the
zipimporter is. A long time ago (when sys.metapath was introduced) I
experimented with imports from non-filesystem sources and that hit me until
I realised what was going on.
S
Steve Holden
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Patrik Iselind <[email protected]>
wrote:
Patrik Iselind added the comment:
Is it enough to include everything in the Lib folder, excluding
__pycache__, site-packages and the test folder in Lib? Would that be
representative enough?
Patrik Iselind
Den 2016-12-25 kl. 17:31, skrev Brett Cannon:
> Brett Cannon added the comment:
>
> Originally zip file importing was faster than standard importing from
disk because of the fewer stat calls, but importlib caches such things so I
don't know if it's still beneficial. As for space savings, I have no idea;
you can try zipping the files yourself to find out the space savings.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <[email protected]>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1116520\>
> _______________________________________
----------
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1116520\>
ncoghlan commented on Dec 26, 2016 Note that Steve Dower made some significant changes to sys.path initialisation on Windows in Python 3.6 that could potentially be generalised to other platforms: https://docs.python.org/3/using/windows.html#finding-modules
(There's nothing inherently Windows specific about them, they're mainly useful for the case of embedding CPython inside a larger application)
One of those was to allow pythonXY.zip to be used as a sentinel indicating the location of PYTHONHOME. soreavis commented on Jul 19, 2026 The 2005 symptom is gone at tip — re-verified today: a zipped stdlib alongside lib-dynload (the report's setup) now starts with zero warnings.
So this looks resolved in practice by later work — suggest closing. brettcannon commented on Jul 20, 2026 soreavis commented on Jul 20, 2026
@soreavis thanks for checking!
Glad I could help
MetadataMetadataDevelopmentNo branches or pull requestsIssue actions
|