GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.11] Clarify re docs for byte pattern group names (GH-99308) by Kentzo · Pull Request #101001 · python/cpython Conversation
|
|
Per comment I don't believe there should be a backport for this. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
#99308 (comment) says otherwise |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @Kentzo . One set of suggestions, otherwise LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for backporting this!
Looks like it's common enough for past versions of docs to contain "removed" for future versions of Python, so would you mind applying CAM's suggestions?
Edit: Since this has been lying around, I think this is fine to merge as is without the more specific directives; 3.12 isn't finalised and this seems like a short time between deprecation and removal.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.