GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.11] gh-89792: Limit test_tools freeze test build parallelism based on the number of cores (GH-101841) by miss-islington · Pull Request #101842 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Feb 12, 2023 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

unhardcode freeze test build parallelism. base it on the number of cpus, don't use more than max(2, os.cpu_count()/3).
(cherry picked from commit dfc2e06)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith [email protected]

  • Issue: Tools/freeze needs tests in the test suite. #89792

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@gpshead @miss-islington
pythongh-89792: Limit test_tools freeze test build parallelism based …
08048dd
…on the number of cores (pythonGH-101841)

unhardcode freeze test build parallelism. base it on the number of cpus, don't use more than max(2, os.cpu_count()/3).
(cherry picked from commit dfc2e06)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Feb 12, 2023
This was referenced Feb 12, 2023
Tools/freeze needs tests in the test suite. #89792
Closed
gh-89792: Limit test_tools freeze test build parallelism based on the number of cores #101841
Merged
gpshead
gpshead approved these changes Feb 12, 2023
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Feb 12, 2023
@miss-islington
miss-islington merged commit cec99ed into python:3.11 Feb 12, 2023
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting merge label Feb 12, 2023
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-dfc2e06-3.11 branch February 12, 2023 06:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gpshead gpshead gpshead approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@miss-islington @gpshead @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.