GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.11] GH-95494: Fix transport EOF handling in OpenSSL 3.0 (GH-95495) by miss-islington · Pull Request #103006 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Mar 24, 2023 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

GH-25309 enabled SSL_OP_IGNORE_UNEXPECTED_EOF by default, with a comment
that it restores OpenSSL 1.1.1 behavior, but this wasn't quite right.
That option causes OpenSSL to treat transport EOF as the same as
close_notify (i.e. SSL_ERROR_ZERO_RETURN), whereas Python actually has
distinct SSLEOFError and SSLZeroReturnError exceptions. (The latter is
usually mapped to a zero return from read.) In OpenSSL 1.1.1, the ssl
module would raise them for transport EOF and close_notify,
respectively. In OpenSSL 3.0, both act like close_notify.

Fix this by, instead, just detecting SSL_R_UNEXPECTED_EOF_WHILE_READING
and mapping that to the other exception type.

There doesn't seem to have been any unit test of this error, so fill in
the missing one. This had to be done with the BIO path because it's
actually slightly tricky to simulate a transport EOF with Python's fd
based APIs. (If you instruct the server to close the socket, it gets
confused, probably because the server's SSL object is still referencing
the now dead fd?)
(cherry picked from commit 420bbb7)

Co-authored-by: David Benjamin [email protected]

  • Issue: ssl module with OpenSSL 3.0 does not throw SSLEOFError on unclean shutdown #95494

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@davidben @miss-islington
pythonGH-95494: Fix transport EOF handling in OpenSSL 3.0 (pythonGH-9…
39705d9
…5495)

pythonGH-25309 enabled SSL_OP_IGNORE_UNEXPECTED_EOF by default, with a comment
that it restores OpenSSL 1.1.1 behavior, but this wasn't quite right.
That option causes OpenSSL to treat transport EOF as the same as
close_notify (i.e. SSL_ERROR_ZERO_RETURN), whereas Python actually has
distinct SSLEOFError and SSLZeroReturnError exceptions. (The latter is
usually mapped to a zero return from read.) In OpenSSL 1.1.1, the ssl
module would raise them for transport EOF and close_notify,
respectively. In OpenSSL 3.0, both act like close_notify.

Fix this by, instead, just detecting SSL_R_UNEXPECTED_EOF_WHILE_READING
and mapping that to the other exception type.

There doesn't seem to have been any unit test of this error, so fill in
the missing one. This had to be done with the BIO path because it's
actually slightly tricky to simulate a transport EOF with Python's fd
based APIs. (If you instruct the server to close the socket, it gets
confused, probably because the server's SSL object is still referencing
the now dead fd?)
(cherry picked from commit 420bbb7)

Co-authored-by: David Benjamin <[email protected]>
This was referenced Mar 24, 2023
ssl module with OpenSSL 3.0 does not throw SSLEOFError on unclean shutdown #95494
Closed
gh-95494: Fix transport EOF handling in OpenSSL 3.0 #95495
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Mar 24, 2023
@ambv
ambv merged commit 13df5d3 into python:3.11 Mar 27, 2023
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting review label Mar 27, 2023
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-420bbb7-3.11 branch March 27, 2023 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@miss-islington @ambv @bedevere-bot @davidben
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.