GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — build(deps): bump requests from 2.29.0 to 2.31.0 in /Doc by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #105368 · python/cpython

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Jun 6, 2023 •
edited by github-actions Bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps requests from 2.29.0 to 2.31.0.

Release notes

Sourced from requests's releases.

v2.31.0

2.31.0 (2023-05-22)

Security

  • Versions of Requests between v2.3.0 and v2.30.0 are vulnerable to potential forwarding of Proxy-Authorization headers to destination servers when following HTTPS redirects.

    When proxies are defined with user info (https://user:pass@proxy:8080), Requests will construct a Proxy-Authorization header that is attached to the request to authenticate with the proxy.

    In cases where Requests receives a redirect response, it previously reattached the Proxy-Authorization header incorrectly, resulting in the value being sent through the tunneled connection to the destination server. Users who rely on defining their proxy credentials in the URL are strongly encouraged to upgrade to Requests 2.31.0+ to prevent unintentional leakage and rotate their proxy credentials once the change has been fully deployed.

    Users who do not use a proxy or do not supply their proxy credentials through the user information portion of their proxy URL are not subject to this vulnerability.

    Full details can be read in our Github Security Advisory and CVE-2023-32681.

v2.30.0

2.30.0 (2023-05-03)

Dependencies

  • ⚠️ Added support for urllib3 2.0. ⚠️

    This may contain minor breaking changes so we advise careful testing and reviewing https://urllib3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/v2-migration-guide.html prior to upgrading.

    Users who wish to stay on urllib3 1.x can pin to urllib3<2.

Changelog

Sourced from requests's changelog.

2.31.0 (2023-05-22)

Security

  • Versions of Requests between v2.3.0 and v2.30.0 are vulnerable to potential forwarding of Proxy-Authorization headers to destination servers when following HTTPS redirects.

    When proxies are defined with user info (https://user:pass@proxy:8080), Requests will construct a Proxy-Authorization header that is attached to the request to authenticate with the proxy.

    In cases where Requests receives a redirect response, it previously reattached the Proxy-Authorization header incorrectly, resulting in the value being sent through the tunneled connection to the destination server. Users who rely on defining their proxy credentials in the URL are strongly encouraged to upgrade to Requests 2.31.0+ to prevent unintentional leakage and rotate their proxy credentials once the change has been fully deployed.

    Users who do not use a proxy or do not supply their proxy credentials through the user information portion of their proxy URL are not subject to this vulnerability.

    Full details can be read in our Github Security Advisory and CVE-2023-32681.

2.30.0 (2023-05-03)

Dependencies

  • ⚠️ Added support for urllib3 2.0. ⚠️

    This may contain minor breaking changes so we advise careful testing and reviewing https://urllib3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/v2-migration-guide.html prior to upgrading.

    Users who wish to stay on urllib3 1.x can pin to urllib3<2.

Commits
  • 147c851 v2.31.0
  • 74ea7cf Merge pull request from GHSA-j8r2-6x86-q33q
  • 3022253 test on pypy 3.8 and pypy 3.9 on windows and macos (#6424)
  • b639e66 test on py3.12 (#6448)
  • d3d5044 Fixed a small typo (#6452)
  • 2ad18e0 v2.30.0
  • f2629e9 Remove strict parameter (#6434)
  • See full diff in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
    You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--105368.org.readthedocs.build/

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@dependabot
build(deps): bump requests from 2.29.0 to 2.31.0 in /Doc
14e443d
Bumps [requests](https://github.com/psf/requests) from 2.29.0 to 2.31.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/psf/requests/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/psf/requests/blob/main/HISTORY.md)
- [Commits](psf/requests@v2.29.0...v2.31.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: requests
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python labels Jun 6, 2023
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Jun 6, 2023
@ambv ambv added skip issue skip news labels Jun 6, 2023
@ambv

ambv commented Jun 6, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I triggerred this based on a "moderate" severity alert on the project's Security tab. The oldest-supported requirements.txt for building docs isn't necessarily high-risk but there's also no reason to keep the security warning hanging.

AlexWaygood reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@ambv
ambv merged commit 963099e into main Jun 6, 2023
@ambv
ambv deleted the dependabot/pip/Doc/requests-2.31.0 branch June 6, 2023 12:35
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting review label Jun 6, 2023
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2023
[3.12] Bump some docs dependencies to resolve a Dependabot security alert (GH-107341) #107342
Merged
This was referenced Sep 8, 2023
gh-109110: Hash-pin GitHub Actions #109111
Closed
Hash-pin GitHub Actions to increase workflow resiliency #109110
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file skip issue skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@ambv @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.