GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.11] gh-98154: Clarify Usage of "Reference Count" In the Docs by ericsnowcurrently · Pull Request #107753 · python/cpython

Conversation

@ericsnowcurrently

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently commented Aug 7, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PEP 683 (immortal objects) revealed some ways in which the Python documentation has been unnecessarily coupled to the implementation details of reference counts. In the end users should focus on reference ownership, including taking references and releasing them, rather than on how many reference counts an object has.

This change updates the documentation to reflect that perspective.

  • Issue: Update Refcount-related Docs #98154

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--107753.org.readthedocs.build/

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@ericsnowcurrently
Clarify Usage of "Reference Count" In the Docs
c5d0db7
PEP 683 (immortal objects) revealed some ways in which the Python documentation has been unnecessarily coupled to the implementation details of reference counts.  In the end users should focus on reference ownership, including taking references and releasing them, rather than on how many reference counts an object has.

This change updates the documentation to reflect that perspective.  It also updates the docs relative to immortal objects in a handful of places.
@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently added skip news needs backport to 3.10 labels Aug 7, 2023
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2023
Update Refcount-related Docs #98154
Closed
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting core review docs Documentation in the Doc dir labels Aug 7, 2023
@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently removed the needs backport to 3.10 label Aug 7, 2023
@ericsnowcurrently
ericsnowcurrently merged commit 951320e into python:3.11 Aug 7, 2023
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting core review label Aug 7, 2023
@ericsnowcurrently
ericsnowcurrently deleted the docs-refcounts-3.11 branch August 7, 2023 22:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@ericsnowcurrently @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.