GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.12] gh-110160: Fix flaky `test_find_periodic_pattern` in `string_tests` (GH-110170) by miss-islington · Pull Request #110182 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Oct 1, 2023 •
edited by bedevere-app Bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(cherry picked from commit 06faa9a)

Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev [email protected]

  • Issue: test_userstring: test_find_periodic_pattern() failed on GHA Hypothesis tests on Ubuntu #110160

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@sobolevn @miss-islington
pythongh-110160: Fix flaky test_find_periodic_pattern in `string_te…
6fe6378 
…sts` (pythonGH-110170)

(cherry picked from commit 06faa9a)

Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev <[email protected]>
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting review label Oct 1, 2023
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2023
test_userstring: test_find_periodic_pattern() failed on GHA Hypothesis tests on Ubuntu #110160
Closed
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the skip news label Oct 1, 2023
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2023
gh-110160: Fix flaky test_find_periodic_pattern in string_tests #110170
Merged
vstinner
vstinner approved these changes Oct 1, 2023
View reviewed changes

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added awaiting core review and removed awaiting review labels Oct 1, 2023
@Yhg1s
Yhg1s merged commit 10af224 into python:3.12 Oct 2, 2023
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot removed the awaiting core review label Oct 2, 2023
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-06faa9a-3.12 branch October 2, 2023 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@vstinner vstinner vstinner approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@miss-islington @vstinner @Yhg1s @sobolevn
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.