GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-112075: Add a little specialization thread safety by DinoV · Pull Request #114768 · python/cpython

Conversation

@DinoV

@DinoV DinoV commented Jan 30, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A couple of specializations call into dict apis w/o a lock and are doing multiple reads. This is just a small change to protect those reads with the dict lock.

  • Issue: Make dict objects thread-safe in --disable-gil builds #112075

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@DinoV DinoV added skip news topic-free-threading labels Jan 30, 2024
@DinoV
DinoV requested review from colesbury and markshannon January 30, 2024 22:29
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2024
Make dict objects thread-safe in --disable-gil builds #112075
Closed
@DinoV
DinoV force-pushed the nogil_dict_module_specialization branch from ded73c4 to a857147 Compare January 31, 2024 00:08
@DinoV DinoV changed the title gh-112075: Lock dict when specializing module lookup gh-112075: Add a little specialization thread safety Jan 31, 2024
@DinoV
Lock dict when specializing module lookup
dc19c16
@DinoV
DinoV force-pushed the nogil_dict_module_specialization branch from a857147 to dc19c16 Compare January 31, 2024 00:26
@DinoV
DinoV marked this pull request as ready for review January 31, 2024 01:32
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting core review label Jan 31, 2024
colesbury
colesbury reviewed Jan 31, 2024
View reviewed changes

@colesbury colesbury left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks okay to me and should not have any effect on the default build.

However, I think we should generally hold off on incremental thread-safety changes to specialization until the dict thread-safe changes are done. I find it hard to tell how these sorts of changes will interact.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Comment thread Python/specialize.c
Comment on lines +847 to +848
int res;
Py_BEGIN_CRITICAL_SECTION(dict);

@colesbury colesbury Jan 31, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this might be easier to read if it is refactored out into it's own function.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@DinoV DinoV closed this May 31, 2024
@DinoV
DinoV deleted the nogil_dict_module_specialization branch May 31, 2024 18:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@colesbury colesbury colesbury left review comments
@markshannon markshannon Awaiting requested review from markshannon

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting core review skip news topic-free-threading

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@DinoV @colesbury
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.