GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-119213: Fix getargs.c to store state in InterpreterState... by 1st1 · Pull Request #119195 · python/cpython
Conversation
1st1
commented
May 20, 2024
•
edited by bedevere-app
Bot
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
...as opposed to storing it in PyRuntime. Storing it in PyRuntime
is fundametally wrong, as its state contains references to Python
objects. Those objects (tuples and strings) can (and will) be
picked by various subinterpreter clean up code, leaving PyRuntime
with broken pointers.
#119194 is a backport to 3.12
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ericsnowcurrently
changed the title
Fix getargs.c to store state in InterpreterState...
gh-119213: Fix getargs.c to store state in InterpreterState...
May 20, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM; perhaps it would make sense to init getargs state just after _PyGC_Init, but I'm not sure it matters; I'll leave that kind of nitpicking to Eric :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
How does this work when the _PyArg_Parser instances are themselves declared as static variables (and are global to the process)? For example:
|
static _PyArg_Parser _parser = { |
|
.keywords = _keywords, |
|
.fname = "Struct", |
|
.kwtuple = KWTUPLE, |
|
}; |
|
erlend-aasland reacted with eyes emoji
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
@colesbury, I'm looking into what's going on. Basically, the statically declared tuple is only for builtin modules. I have a solution that's different from Yury's but want to be sure it's correct before closing this one.
|
erlend-aasland reacted with thumbs up emoji
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Reviewers
ericsnowcurrently
Awaiting requested review from ericsnowcurrently
ericsnowcurrently is a code owner
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|