GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.11] GH-130396: Treat clang -Og as optimized for gdb tests (GH-130550) (GH-130573) by miss-islington · Pull Request #130593 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Feb 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

GH-130396: Treat clang -Og as optimized for gdb tests (GH-130550)

(cherry picked from commit 129db32)
(cherry picked from commit c4aeb4c)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Mark Shannon [email protected]

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@vstinner @markshannon @miss-islington
[3.12] pythonGH-130396: Treat clang -Og as optimized for gdb tests (p…
40b2e6b 
…ythonGH-130550) (pythonGH-130573)

pythonGH-130396: Treat clang -Og as optimized for gdb tests (pythonGH-130550)

(cherry picked from commit 129db32)
(cherry picked from commit c4aeb4c)

Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mark Shannon <[email protected]>
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the skip news label Feb 26, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2025
[3.12] GH-130396: Treat clang -Og as optimized for gdb tests (GH-130550) #130573
Merged
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting review label Feb 26, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2025
Implement stack overflow protection for linux based on actual stack depth #130396
Closed
@vstinner

vstinner commented Feb 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

!buildbot PPC64LE Fedora Stable Clang
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@bedevere-bot

bedevere-bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @vstinner for commit 40b2e6b 🤖

Results will be shown at:

https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/grid?branch=refs%2Fpull%2F130593%2Fmerge

The command will test the builders whose names match following regular expression: PPC64LE Fedora Stable Clang

The builders matched are:

  • PPC64LE Fedora Stable Clang Installed PR
  • PPC64LE Fedora Stable Clang PR
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@vstinner vstinner mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2025
PPC64LE Fedora Stable Clang 3.x fails test_gdb #104736
Closed
@vstinner

vstinner commented Feb 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@pablogsal: Would you mind to review this test_gdb fix backport to Python 3.11?

buildbot/PPC64LE Fedora Stable Clang Installed PR — Build done.
buildbot/PPC64LE Fedora Stable Clang PR — Build done.

test_gdb succeeded on the two buildbots. This change fix: #104736 (comment).
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@vstinner

vstinner commented Feb 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @encukou
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
pablogsal
pablogsal approved these changes Feb 27, 2025
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Feb 27, 2025
@pablogsal
pablogsal merged commit f1897d3 into python:3.11 Feb 27, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot removed the awaiting merge label Feb 27, 2025
@vstinner

vstinner commented Feb 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the merge @pablogsal.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-c4aeb4c-3.11 branch January 2, 2026 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pablogsal pablogsal pablogsal approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@miss-islington @vstinner @bedevere-bot @pablogsal
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.