GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-130664: specify how thousands separators are used with 0-padding by skirpichev · Pull Request #131030 · python/cpython Conversation
|
| (``'0'``) character enables sign-aware zero-padding for numeric types, | ||
| excluding :class:`complex`. This is equivalent to a *fill* character of | ||
| ``'0'`` with an *alignment* type of ``'='``. | ||
| ``'0'`` with an *alignment* type of ``'='``. If digit group separators of the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm a bit surprised that "digit group separator" is mentioned here while we only mention it in the "grouping option" paragraph below. Maybe we should mention it at that place or mention here that this will be introduced below?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the different parts of the format are interconnected, there may be references to options described in details below.
But I think that we should unify wording and avoid repetition of what specifies the grouping option. "If the grouping option for the integral part is used, a digit group separator is also inserted between leading zeros."
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@serhiy-storchaka, I think that remark was addressed. Is there anything left?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
CC @ericvsmith |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.