GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-100239: more refined specialisation stats for BINARY_OP/SUBSCR by iritkatriel · Pull Request #132068 · python/cpython

Conversation

@iritkatriel

@iritkatriel iritkatriel commented Apr 4, 2025 •
edited by bedevere-app Bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • Issue: Specialize long tail of binary operations using a table. #100239

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
iritkatriel added 2 commits April 3, 2025 11:29
@iritkatriel
add stats
ebd800a
@iritkatriel
calculate max failure index
d7052e4
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting core review label Apr 4, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2025
Specialize long tail of binary operations using a table. #100239
Open
@iritkatriel iritkatriel added the skip news label Apr 4, 2025
@iritkatriel
iritkatriel requested a review from markshannon April 4, 2025 10:56
markshannon
markshannon approved these changes Apr 4, 2025
View reviewed changes

@markshannon markshannon left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

It would be nice to gather the type information we want in a more general way, but I don't see how to do that without adding a lot more complexity.
Maybe one day, but this is just fine for now.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting core review labels Apr 4, 2025
@iritkatriel
iritkatriel merged commit df59226 into python:main Apr 4, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot removed the awaiting merge label Apr 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@markshannon markshannon markshannon approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@iritkatriel @markshannon
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.