GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — GH-123299: Copyedit 3.14 What's New: Remove PEP prefixes by AA-Turner · Pull Request #139629 · python/cpython

Conversation

@AA-Turner

@AA-Turner AA-Turner commented Oct 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • Issue: What's New in Python 3.14 (copyediting) #123299

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--139629.org.readthedocs.build/en/139629/whatsnew/3.14.html

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@AA-Turner
Copyedit What's New: Remove PEP prefixes
a47cec4
@AA-Turner AA-Turner added the skip news label Oct 5, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Oct 5, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot added this to Docs PRs Oct 5, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Todo in Docs PRs Oct 5, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Oct 5, 2025
What's New in Python 3.14 (copyediting) #123299
Closed
hugovk
hugovk requested changes Oct 6, 2025
View reviewed changes

@hugovk hugovk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed in #139425 (comment), I think we should keep the prefixes.

They're a useful reference, people frequently talk about new feature in terms of PEP numbers.

I agree they should not be emphasised as much in the general reference material, but What's New is more of a marketing page, and the PEP numbers are an important part of that: they're the enhancement proposals that result in these new things.

cc @picnixz

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
picnixz reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction
@bedevere-app

bedevere-app Bot commented Oct 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

When you're done making the requested changes, leave the comment: I have made the requested changes; please review again.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting changes label Oct 6, 2025
@vstinner

vstinner commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I would also prefer to keep PEP numbers.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Apr 30, 2026
@vstinner

vstinner commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Python 3.14 was released last October. As I wrote, I prefer to keep PEP numbers in What's New in Python 3.14. IMO it's too late to change such detail in the document anyway. I close the PR.
hugovk reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@vstinner vstinner closed this Apr 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@hugovk hugovk hugovk requested changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting changes docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

Projects

Docs PRs
Status: Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@AA-Turner @vstinner @hugovk
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.