GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.15] Link to existing rules in compound_stmts.rst (GH-149811) by miss-islington · Pull Request #149836 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented May 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In gh-138418, ! was added to links to rules that don't exist in
the docs, in order to silence broken link warnings.
However, productionlist doesn't parse the !, which ends up in
the rendered documentation. (It's possible that gh-127835 broke
the ! support.)

Replace the names with ones that appear in docs:

  • star_named_expression in the grammar corresponds to
    flexible_expression in the docs
  • star_named_expressions in the grammar corresponds to
    flexible_expression_list in the docs
  • named_expression in the grammar corresponds to
    assignment_expression in the docs

Having two sets of names isn't great of course. Consolidating them
is tracked in (subissues of) gh-127833.
(cherry picked from commit c375292)

Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin [email protected]

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@encukou @miss-islington
Link to existing rules in compound_stmts.rst (pythonGH-149811)
4200d3e
In pythongh-138418, `!` was added to links to rules that don't exist in
the docs, in order to silence broken link warnings.
However, productionlist doesn't parse the `!`, which ends up in
the rendered documentation. (It's possible that pythongh-127835 broke
the `!` support.)

Replace the names with ones that appear in docs:

- `star_named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to
  `flexible_expression` in the docs
- `star_named_expressions` in the grammar corresponds to
  `flexible_expression_list` in the docs
- `named_expression` in the grammar corresponds to
  `assignment_expression` in the docs

Having two sets of names isn't great of course. Consolidating them
is tracked in (subissues of) pythongh-127833.
(cherry picked from commit c375292)

Co-authored-by: Petr Viktorin <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
miss-islington requested review from AA-Turner and willingc as code owners May 14, 2026 16:48
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news labels May 14, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot added this to Docs PRs May 14, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Todo in Docs PRs May 14, 2026
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request May 14, 2026
Link to existing rules in compound_stmts.rst #149811
Merged
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added skip issue awaiting review labels May 14, 2026
@encukou
encukou merged commit 451f06b into python:3.15 May 14, 2026
40 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Todo to Done in Docs PRs May 14, 2026
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot removed the awaiting review label May 14, 2026
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-c375292-3.15 branch May 14, 2026 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@willingc willingc Awaiting requested review from willingc willingc is a code owner
@AA-Turner AA-Turner Awaiting requested review from AA-Turner AA-Turner is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news

Projects

Docs PRs
Status: Done

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@miss-islington @encukou
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.