GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — gh-155327: Guard SSLSocket chain methods after TLS teardown by tonghuaroot · Pull Request #155328 · python/cpython

Conversation

@tonghuaroot

@tonghuaroot tonghuaroot commented Aug 7, 2026 •
edited by bedevere-app Bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

SSLSocket.get_verified_chain() and get_unverified_chain() accessed
self._sslobj without the _checkClosed() / None guard used by every other
query method, so they raised AttributeError when called after the TLS layer
was torn down (for example after unwrap()). Add the guard and return an empty
list, matching the value these methods return for an empty chain.

  • Issue: SSLSocket.get_verified_chain() and get_unverified_chain() raise AttributeError after the TLS layer is torn down #155327

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@tonghuaroot
pythongh-155327: Guard SSLSocket chain methods after TLS teardown
d8eca31
get_verified_chain() and get_unverified_chain() accessed self._sslobj without
the guard used by the other query methods, raising AttributeError after
unwrap(). Return an empty list instead.
@tonghuaroot
tonghuaroot requested review from gpshead and picnixz as code owners August 7, 2026 12:18
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2026
SSLSocket.get_verified_chain() and get_unverified_chain() raise AttributeError after the TLS layer is torn down #155327
Open
@bedevere-app bedevere-app Bot added the awaiting review label Aug 7, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Nov 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gpshead gpshead Awaiting requested review from gpshead gpshead is a code owner
@picnixz picnixz Awaiting requested review from picnixz picnixz is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting review stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@tonghuaroot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.