GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |
GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.14] gh-159739: Preserve large years in time conversions (GH-160175) by miss-islington · Pull Request #161648 · python/cpython Conversation
Contributor
The time module added 1900 to the C library year using int arithmetic, which overflowed for timestamps whose calendar year exceeds INT_MAX. On platforms that accept these timestamps, gmtime(), localtime(), and ctime() could report a negative year; perform the addition in a wider type. Backport to 3.15 and 3.14.
Time tuple consumers parsed calendar years as C int before subtracting 1900, so they rejected valid struct_time results. Date and datetime timestamp conversion could also overflow before reporting the invalid year. Preserve the full time tuple range and report oversized datetime years correctly. Backport to 3.15 and 3.14. Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra [email protected]
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions…60175) * pythongh-159739: Preserve large years in time conversions The time module added 1900 to the C library year using int arithmetic, which overflowed for timestamps whose calendar year exceeds INT_MAX. On platforms that accept these timestamps, gmtime(), localtime(), and ctime() could report a negative year; perform the addition in a wider type. Backport to 3.15 and 3.14. * pythongh-159739: Round-trip large years and validate datetime timestamps Time tuple consumers parsed calendar years as C int before subtracting 1900, so they rejected valid struct_time results. Date and datetime timestamp conversion could also overflow before reporting the invalid year. Preserve the full time tuple range and report oversized datetime years correctly. Backport to 3.15 and 3.14. (cherry picked from commit e1a4c15) Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
This was referenced
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
StanFromIreland
marked this pull request as draft
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |