GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-1635741: Port _abc extension module to multiphase initialization(PEP 489) by shihai1991 · Pull Request #18030 · python/cpython

Conversation

@shihai1991

@shihai1991 shihai1991 commented Jan 16, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

https://bugs.python.org/issue1635741

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@shihai1991
Port _abc extension module to multiphase initialization(PEP 489)
f0a9589
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Jan 16, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Jan 16, 2020
blurb-it Bot and others added 2 commits January 16, 2020 12:00
@blurb-it
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
ba41ab9
@shihai1991
update news
596ab3c
@shihai1991
shihai1991 requested review from encukou and ncoghlan February 5, 2020 12:38
@shihai1991
shihai1991 requested a review from vstinner February 17, 2020 13:07
@vstinner
vstinner merged commit 4c1b6a6 into python:master Feb 17, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting review label Feb 17, 2020
@vstinner

vstinner commented Feb 17, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Merged, thanks.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@adamchainz adamchainz mentioned this pull request May 11, 2021
Use PEP 489 multi-phase extension module initialization adamchainz/time-machine#136
Closed
@kylotan kylotan mannequin mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2022
Py_Finalize() doesn't clear all Python objects at exit #44470
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@encukou encukou Awaiting requested review from encukou
@ncoghlan ncoghlan Awaiting requested review from ncoghlan
@vstinner vstinner Awaiting requested review from vstinner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@shihai1991 @vstinner @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.