GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-1635741: Calling Py_INCREF() after PyModule_AddObject() success to run by shihai1991 · Pull Request #18365 · python/cpython Conversation
|
|
Oh, it is generated file, i will check this operation soon. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
cc @vstinner Hi, victor. It's a small fix. pls review it if you have free time. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
I recently saw a PR from @brandtbucher about a more general change that already includes this if I am not mistaken. Check out #17276 (it moves incref after the check by moving check upper). I am in favor of #17276 because it handles the case better also it opened before this PR |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
I'm also working my way through the other broken modules in bpo-38823. I need to land #17298 before I can make further progress, though. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, my PR #17276 is a more comprehensive fix.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Oh, thank you for quick feedback, guys. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.