GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-1635741: Port _functools module to multiphase initialization (PEP-489) by phsilva · Pull Request #19151 · python/cpython

Conversation

@phsilva

@phsilva phsilva commented Mar 25, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

https://bugs.python.org/issue1635741

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Paulo Henrique Silva
bpo-1635741: Port _functools module to multiphase initialization (PEP…
d9195a4 
… 489)
@phsilva
phsilva requested a review from rhettinger as a code owner March 25, 2020 01:28
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Mar 25, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Mar 25, 2020
@vstinner
vstinner merged commit 7dd549e into python:master Mar 25, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting review label Mar 25, 2020
@vstinner

vstinner commented Mar 26, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change introduced a regression: bpo-40071 "test__xxsubinterpreters leaked [1, 1, 1] references: test_ids_global()".
phsilva reacted with thumbs up emoji phsilva reacted with eyes emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction
  • 👀 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@phsilva
phsilva deleted the bpo-1635741-functools branch March 26, 2020 03:06
@kylotan kylotan mannequin mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2022
Py_Finalize() doesn't clear all Python objects at exit #44470
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rhettinger rhettinger Awaiting requested review from rhettinger

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@phsilva @vstinner @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.