GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [WIP] bpo-39465: Mark _Py_Identifier.object as atomic by vstinner · Pull Request #20390 · python/cpython

Conversation

@vstinner

@vstinner vstinner commented May 25, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR is basically a test to check if C compilers used by CPython
support C11 _Atomic specifier.

https://bugs.python.org/issue39465

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@vstinner vstinner added the skip news label May 25, 2020
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label May 25, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting core review label May 25, 2020
@vstinner
[WIP] bpo-39465: Mark _Py_Identifier.object as atomic
5cfdbab 
This PR is basically a test to check if C compilers used by CPython
support C11 _Atomic specifier.
@vstinner

vstinner commented May 25, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Windows x64 job failed with MSC compiler error:

Include\cpython\object.h(51,5): error C2061: syntax error: identifier '_Atomic'

That's not a good start :-(
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@vstinner vstinner mentioned this pull request May 25, 2020
bpo-39465: Fix _PyUnicode_FromId() for subinterpreters #20058
Merged
@vstinner

vstinner commented Dec 23, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I moved to a different approach: PR #20766.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@vstinner vstinner closed this Dec 23, 2020
@vstinner
vstinner deleted the atomic branch December 23, 2020 02:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting core review skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@vstinner @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.