GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.8] [3.9] bpo-41520: Fix second codeop regression (GH-21848) by miss-islington · Pull Request #21862 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Aug 13, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix the repression introduced by the initial regression fix.

(cherry picked from commit c818b15)
Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit f24430f)

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue41520

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@terryjreedy @miss-islington
[3.9] bpo-41520: Fix second codeop regression (pythonGH-21848)
ae518b3 
Fix the repression introduced by the initial regression fix.

(cherry picked from commit c818b15)
Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f24430f)

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <[email protected]>
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Aug 13, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Aug 13, 2020
bpo-41520: Fix second codeop regression #21848
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error awaiting review labels Aug 13, 2020
terryjreedy
terryjreedy approved these changes Aug 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Aug 13, 2020
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Aug 13, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@terryjreedy: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@miss-islington
miss-islington merged commit a3416c1 into python:3.8 Aug 13, 2020
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting merge label Aug 13, 2020
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-f24430f-3.8 branch August 13, 2020 18:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@terryjreedy terryjreedy terryjreedy approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@miss-islington @terryjreedy @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.