GeezerVison

@vstinner There are more types to convert to heap types. Even so I think these changes are too much and they should be staged in multiple PRs.

I'm wondering how you think I should go about dividing it.

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days

https://bugs.python.org/issue1635741 is closed. What is the status of this PR?

The change is still relevant, but should use a new issue number.

Moreover, the SC asked to put the conversion of static types to heap types on hold. @encukou and @erlend-aasland wrote https://peps.python.org/pep-0687/ which may unblock the situation but it's still a draft.

@koubaa, PEP 687 was accepted. Are you going to follow up this PR?

@erlend-aasland I'd love to - but I doubt I will get time in the near term. Others could use my PRs as a reference in case they find it useful towards doing pep 687

@erlend-aasland I'd love to - but I doubt I will get time in the near term. Others could use my PRs as a reference in case they find it useful towards doing pep 687

All right, I'll pick it up.

Thanks for all your work on isolating extension modules.

I'm closing this in order to split it up into multiple PRs.