GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-43680: _pyio.open() becomes a static method by vstinner · Pull Request #25354 · python/cpython
Conversation
vstinner
commented
Apr 12, 2021
•
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The Python _pyio.open() function becomes a static method to behave as
io.open() built-in function: don't become a bound method when stored
as a class variable. It becomes possible since static methods are now
callable in Python 3.10. Moreover, _pyio.OpenWrapper becomes a simple
alias to _pyio.open.
init_set_builtins_open() now sets builtins.open to io.open, rather
than setting it to io.OpenWrapper, since OpenWrapper is now an alias
to open in the io and _pyio modules.
https://bugs.python.org/issue43680
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The Python _pyio.open() function becomes a static method to behave as
io.open() built-in function: don't become a bound method when stored
as a class variable. It becomes possible since static methods are now
callable in Python 3.10. Moreover, _pyio.OpenWrapper becomes a simple
alias to _pyio.open.
init_set_builtins_open() now sets builtins.open to io.open, rather
than setting it to io.OpenWrapper, since OpenWrapper is now an alias
to open in the io and _pyio modules.
|
@methane: Would you mind to review this change?
Thanks to https://bugs.python.org/issue43682, it becomes possible to put @staticmethod on _pyio.open. I propose to start with this change. Then I will propose a change to deprecate io.OpenWrapper and _pyio.OpenWrapper.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Can we remove DocDescriptor too?
It is not defined in C _io module. So I think it is safe to remove.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Can we remove DocDescriptor too?
It is not defined in C _io module. So I think it is safe to remove.
Sure, it was not documented and doesn't exist in the io module. I already removed it: 3bc694d
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Reviewers
methane
methane left review comments
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.