GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-46564: do not create frame object for super object by kumaraditya303 · Pull Request #31002 · python/cpython

Conversation

@kumaraditya303

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 commented Jan 29, 2022 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

https://bugs.python.org/issue46564

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@kumaraditya303
do not create frame object for super
49c5113
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Jan 29, 2022
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Jan 29, 2022
@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 changed the title do not create frame object for super bpo46564: do not create frame object for super object Jan 29, 2022
@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 changed the title bpo46564: do not create frame object for super object bpo-46564: do not create frame object for super object Jan 29, 2022
@kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2022 04:59
@kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 requested a review from markshannon as a code owner January 29, 2022 04:59
@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner added the DO-NOT-MERGE label Jan 29, 2022
@Fidget-Spinner

Fidget-Spinner commented Jan 29, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Marking DO-NOT-MERGE as it's already part of #30992. There's more discussion about this on the issue tracker.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@markshannon markshannon mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2022
bpo-46564: Optimize super().meth() calls via adaptive superinstructions #30992
Closed
@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner removed the DO-NOT-MERGE label Feb 1, 2022
Fidget-Spinner
Fidget-Spinner reviewed Feb 1, 2022
View reviewed changes

@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please write a short news entry. I'll merge after that.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Comment thread Objects/typeobject.c Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
blurb-it Bot and others added 3 commits February 1, 2022 10:23
@blurb-it
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
2573827
@kumaraditya303
style fix
3c5de54
@kumaraditya303
Update Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2022-02-01-10-23-21.bpo-465…
a3bc1ab 
…64.6Xc2_H.rst
@kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 requested a review from Fidget-Spinner February 1, 2022 10:40
Fidget-Spinner
Fidget-Spinner reviewed Feb 1, 2022
View reviewed changes
Comment thread Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2022-02-01-10-23-21.bpo-46564.6Xc2_H.rst Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@Fidget-Spinner
Update news
03cc71a
Fidget-Spinner
Fidget-Spinner approved these changes Feb 1, 2022
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Feb 1, 2022
@Fidget-Spinner
Fidget-Spinner merged commit b9ebde8 into python:main Feb 1, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting merge label Feb 1, 2022
@Fidget-Spinner

Fidget-Spinner commented Feb 1, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 deleted the super branch February 2, 2022 04:36
@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner mentioned this pull request Apr 27, 2023
Near zero-cost super().meth() calls via adaptive superinstructions #90722
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner approved these changes
@markshannon markshannon Awaiting requested review from markshannon markshannon is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@kumaraditya303 @Fidget-Spinner @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.