GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — bpo-46541: Remove usage of _Py_IDENTIFIER from lzma module by corona10 · Pull Request #31683 · python/cpython

Conversation

@corona10

@corona10 corona10 commented Mar 4, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

https://bugs.python.org/issue46541

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@corona10
corona10 requested review from ericsnowcurrently and erlend-aasland March 4, 2022 14:46
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting core review label Mar 4, 2022
@the-knights-who-say-ni the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label Mar 4, 2022
@kumaraditya303

kumaraditya303 commented Mar 4, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Wrong bpo number ?
erlend-aasland and corona10 reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 2 reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
erlend-aasland
erlend-aasland approved these changes Mar 4, 2022
View reviewed changes

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check bpo number; else looks good to me.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 approved these changes Mar 4, 2022
View reviewed changes

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@corona10
bpo-46541: Remove usage of _Py_IDENTIFIER from lzma module
332d17f
@corona10 corona10 changed the title bpo-46430: Remove usage of _Py_IDENTIFIER from lzma module bpo-46541: Remove usage of _Py_IDENTIFIER from lzma module Mar 4, 2022
@corona10
corona10 force-pushed the bpo-46430-lzma branch from 7401a0d to 332d17f Compare March 4, 2022 15:06
@corona10

corona10 commented Mar 4, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I will merge this PR once the adding label is available, it looks like the outage situation.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ericsnowcurrently
ericsnowcurrently approved these changes Mar 4, 2022
View reviewed changes

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting core review labels Mar 4, 2022
@corona10 corona10 added the skip news label Mar 4, 2022
@corona10
corona10 merged commit d168c72 into python:main Mar 4, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting merge label Mar 4, 2022
@corona10
corona10 deleted the bpo-46430-lzma branch March 4, 2022 16:38
@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently mentioned this pull request Jul 9, 2022
Replace _Py_IDENTIFIER() with statically initialized objects. #90699
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently ericsnowcurrently approved these changes
@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland erlend-aasland approved these changes
@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

6 participants

@corona10 @kumaraditya303 @ericsnowcurrently @erlend-aasland @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.