GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.11] gh-91162: Support splitting of unpacked arbitrary-length tuple over TypeVar and TypeVarTuple parameters (alt) (GH-93412) by miss-islington · Pull Request #93746 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jun 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For example:

A[T, *Ts][*tuple[int, ...]] -> A[int, *tuple[int, ...]]
A[*Ts, T][*tuple[int, ...]] -> A[*tuple[int, ...], int]
(cherry picked from commit 3473817)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka [email protected]

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@serhiy-storchaka @miss-islington
pythongh-91162: Support splitting of unpacked arbitrary-length tuple …
16bce97
…over TypeVar and TypeVarTuple parameters (alt) (pythonGH-93412)

For example:

  A[T, *Ts][*tuple[int, ...]] -> A[int, *tuple[int, ...]]
  A[*Ts, T][*tuple[int, ...]] -> A[*tuple[int, ...], int]
(cherry picked from commit 3473817)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
miss-islington requested review from Fidget-Spinner, JelleZijlstra and gvanrossum as code owners June 12, 2022 13:22
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 12, 2022
gh-91162: Support splitting of unpacked arbitrary-length tuple over TypeVar and TypeVarTuple parameters (alt) #93412
Merged
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jun 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 similar comment
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jun 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the awaiting review label Jun 12, 2022
@serhiy-storchaka

serhiy-storchaka commented Jun 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@pablogsal, could you please regenerate the ABI data for this PR?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jun 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ❌ .

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@pablogsal

pablogsal commented Jun 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@pablogsal, could you please regenerate the ABI data for this PR?

Done 👍

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@pablogsal
Regenerate ABI file
a5faeac
@pablogsal
pablogsal force-pushed the backport-3473817-3.11 branch from 43c5336 to a5faeac Compare June 12, 2022 17:59
@serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka merged commit 8dc5df4 into python:3.11 Jun 14, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting review label Jun 14, 2022
@serhiy-storchaka

serhiy-storchaka commented Jun 14, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-3473817-3.11 branch June 14, 2022 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gvanrossum gvanrossum Awaiting requested review from gvanrossum gvanrossum is a code owner
@Fidget-Spinner Fidget-Spinner Awaiting requested review from Fidget-Spinner
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra Awaiting requested review from JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@miss-islington @serhiy-storchaka @pablogsal @bedevere-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.