GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.11] gh-92611: Add details on replacements for cgi utility funcs (GH-92792) by miss-islington · Pull Request #93967 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jun 17, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Per @brettcannon 's suggestions on the Discourse thread, discussed in GH-92611 and as a followup to PR GH-92612 , this PR add additional specific per-function replacement information for the utility functions in the cgi module deprecated by PEP 594 (PEP-594).

@brettcannon , should this be backported (without the deprecated-removed , which I would update it accordingly and re-add in my other PR adding that to the others for 3.11+), or just go in 3.11+?
(cherry picked from commit 71354ad)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach [email protected]

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@CAM-Gerlach @miss-islington
pythongh-92611: Add details on replacements for cgi utility funcs (py…
8f71571 
…thonGH-92792)

Per @brettcannon 's [suggestions on the Discourse thread](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-594-take-2-removing-dead-batteries-from-the-standard-library/13508/51), discussed in pythonGH-92611 and as a followup to PR pythonGH-92612 , this PR add additional specific per-function replacement information for the utility functions in the `cgi` module deprecated by PEP 594 (PEP-594).

@brettcannon , should this be backported (without the `deprecated-removed` , which I would update it accordingly and re-add in my other PR adding that to the others for 3.11+), or just go in 3.11+?
(cherry picked from commit 71354ad)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
miss-islington requested a review from ethanfurman as a code owner June 17, 2022 21:05
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the skip news label Jun 17, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2022
gh-92611: Add details on replacements for cgi utility funcs #92792
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels Jun 17, 2022
brettcannon
brettcannon approved these changes Jun 17, 2022
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Jun 17, 2022
@brettcannon brettcannon added awaiting review 🤖 automerge and removed awaiting merge labels Jun 17, 2022
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Jun 17, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@brettcannon
brettcannon merged commit 41964de into python:3.11 Jun 21, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting review label Jun 21, 2022
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-71354ad-3.11 branch June 21, 2022 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@brettcannon brettcannon brettcannon approved these changes
@ethanfurman ethanfurman Awaiting requested review from ethanfurman ethanfurman is a code owner

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@miss-islington @brettcannon @bedevere-bot @CAM-Gerlach
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.