GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [3.10] gh-96819: multiprocessing.resource_tracker: check if length of pipe write <= 512 (GH-96890) by miss-islington · Pull Request #97746 · python/cpython

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Oct 3, 2022 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 19ca114)

Co-authored-by: Koki Saito [email protected]

  • Issue: Multiprocessing resource tracker incorrectly checks pipe write length #96819

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@saito828koki @miss-islington
pythongh-96819: multiprocessing.resource_tracker: check if length of …
ade8f87 
…pipe write <= 512 (pythonGH-96890)

Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 19ca114)

Co-authored-by: Koki Saito <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2022
gh-96819: check if the length of a pipe write is not greater than 512 #96890
Merged
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error awaiting review labels Oct 3, 2022
JelleZijlstra
JelleZijlstra approved these changes Oct 3, 2022
View reviewed changes
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting merge and removed awaiting review labels Oct 3, 2022
@miss-islington

miss-islington commented Oct 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@miss-islington
miss-islington merged commit c2d3f73 into python:3.10 Oct 3, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the awaiting merge label Oct 3, 2022
@miss-islington
miss-islington deleted the backport-19ca114-3.10 branch October 3, 2022 01:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@miss-islington @JelleZijlstra @bedevere-bot @saito828koki
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.