GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Improve PR review checklist · Issue #962 · python/devguide

Improve PR review checklist #962

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Open
Open
Improve PR review checklist#962
Copy link
Labels
topic-pull requeststopic-triagetype-bugEditing of existing content neededEditing of existing content neededtype-featureAdditions; New content or section neededAdditions; New content or section needed

Description

@ezio-melotti
ezio-melotti
opened on Oct 7, 2022
Issue body actions

In python/cpython#93823 (comment) @erlend-aasland wrote a checklist about reviewing PRs.

In #914 (comment), I suggested:

SGTM -- that's a nice list. I think it would be easier to add it in a separate PR though.
Reviewing PRs is currently documented in two places:

  • https://devguide.python.org/getting-started/pull-request-lifecycle/#reviewing
  • https://devguide.python.org/triage/triaging/#reviewing-patches

The former has been likely written from scratch after the HG->Git migration, whereas the latter formerly documented how to review patches attached to a bpo issue and then it has been adapted to GitHub. I think the best approach would be to enhance the pull-request-lifecycle with your list, and remove the duplicated info in triaging.

Activity

  1. ezio-melotti
    added
    type-featureAdditions; New content or section neededAdditions; New content or section needed
    on Oct 7, 2022
  2. erlend-aasland commented on Oct 10, 2022

    @erlend-aasland
    erlend-aasland
    on Oct 10, 2022
    Contributor
    More actions

    Thanks for the PR! Can we close this?

  3. ezio-melotti commented on Oct 12, 2022

    @ezio-melotti
    ezio-melotti
    on Oct 12, 2022
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    #914 only included the changes that I had initially created, and I now merged it to keep things moving incrementally like Diataxis suggests.
    The checklist you suggested in the comment linked above is more comprehensive and can still be integrated in the devguide to improve the current checklist, so I opened this issue as a reminder.

  4. abdnafees commented on Nov 24, 2022

    @abdnafees
    abdnafees
    on Nov 24, 2022
    Contributor
    More actions

    @ezio-melotti Can I please work on this issue?

  5. willingc
    added
    type-bugEditing of existing content neededEditing of existing content needed
    topic-triage
    topic-pull requests
    type-featureAdditions; New content or section neededAdditions; New content or section needed
    and removed
    type-featureAdditions; New content or section neededAdditions; New content or section needed
    on Oct 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    topic-pull requeststopic-triagetype-bugEditing of existing content neededEditing of existing content neededtype-featureAdditions; New content or section neededAdditions; New content or section needed

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.