GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Prefer the greater metadata directory when a path supplies several by jaraco · Pull Request #550 · python/importlib_metadata Conversation
Member
Addresses python/cpython#100666. An unclean upgrade can leave a stale
The sort lives in LimitationThe ordering is lexicographic on the directory name, not on the parsed version, so Tests
The first three fail with the sort reverted. An earlier two-version form of them passed without the fix by luck of the APFS listing order, hence the four versions and the exact-sequence assertion.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsAn unclean upgrade can leave a stale `.dist-info` beside the installed one, and because the order of `os.listdir` is arbitrary, which of them answered a query was a matter of chance. Consider the children in reverse lexicographic order so the greater one is found first. The ordering is lexicographic on the directory name and not on the parsed version, so it only approximates a preference for the newer version, but it needs no version parser and so is available to the stdlib. Ref python/cpython#100666. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]> Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
jaraco
commented
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In retrospect - adding this change does make a significant change to the flow of data, requiring the whole iterable to be consumed before processing can proceed.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |