GeezerVison is showing github.com — Re-use joinpath logic in Traversable and MultiplexedPath by jaraco · Pull Request #250 · python/importlib_resources
Conversation
jaraco
commented
Apr 17, 2022
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Inspired by #248 (comment)
- Inline the flattening of descendants.
- Move ResourceContainer.joinpath to Traversable.joinpath, providing a concrete implementation.
- Refactor to converge descendants to a single type and rely on Path.parts for getting the parts.
- Replace StopIteration with a TraversalError for use in capturing a failed traversal.
- In readers.MultiplexedPath, re-use Traversable.joinpath.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had the look at the PR and it seems good. Thank you for splitting each logical change into its own commit.
I only have one note.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
|
try:
|
|
|
return next(matches).joinpath(*names)
|
|
|
except StopIteration:
|
|
|
raise TraversalError(
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only way for this to happen is no arguments being passed, no? Wouldn't checking for that directly make the code easier to read?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that's correct. A StopIteration would occur if none of the traversable.name == target in the matches above (including if self.iterdir() yields no results). It's trapping StopIteration on next(matches), not *names. *names can be empty. Maybe only the exception should be trapped for next(matches).
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, right, that makes sense.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…concrete implementation.
…rts for getting the parts.
Reviewers
FFY00
FFY00 approved these changes
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|