GeezerVison is showing github.com — Improve types and `bytes` usage of `pathlib` by sobolevn · Pull Request #9016 · python/typeshed
Conversation
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
|
def read_text(self, encoding: str | None = ..., errors: str | None = ...) -> str: ...
|
|
|
def samefile(self, other_path: str | bytes | int | Path) -> bool: ...
|
|
|
def write_bytes(self, data: bytes) -> int: ...
|
|
|
def samefile(self, other_path: StrPath) -> bool: ...
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This just calls other_path.stat(), which should also work with Path[bytes]. In case it's not a Path, it's passed on to os.stat(), which uses int | StrOrBytesPath. I therefore think the following would be correct:
|
def samefile(self, other_path: StrPath) -> bool: ... |
|
def samefile(self, other_path: StrOrBytesPath | int) -> bool: ... |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Path[bytes] isn't a thing — Path isn't a generic class. pathlib only makes promises to work with string paths, unlike os.path or functions in os
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I always mix up Path and PathLike. The annotation should be correct nevertheless.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
AlexWaygood reacted with thumbs up emoji
sobolevn
Oct 28, 2022
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here' how this method is implemented:
def samefile(self, other_path):
st = self.stat()
try:
other_st = other_path.stat()
except AttributeError:
other_st = self.__class__(other_path).stat()
return os.path.samestat(st, other_st)
So, other_path can either be:
- Something with
.stat() method (assuming Path, it can be a new protocol, but I don't think it is worth it right now)
- Something that
self.__class__.__new__ accepts: StrPath (== str | PathLike[str])
But, Path is a part of StrPath, because Path is PathLike[str].
That's why StrPath seems correct to me. Am I missing something?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah interesting, I was looking at the 3.9 version of the implementation:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/b43496c01a554cf41ae654a0379efae18609ad39/Lib/pathlib.py#L1145-L1154
def samefile(self, other_path):
"""Return whether other_path is the same or not as this file
(as returned by os.path.samefile()).
"""
st = self.stat()
try:
other_st = other_path.stat()
except AttributeError:
other_st = self._accessor.stat(other_path)
return os.path.samestat(st, other_st)
No need to version guard this. Let's just use the latest version (yours).
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Diff from mypy_primer, showing the effect of this PR on open source code:
bandersnatch (https://github.com/pypa/bandersnatch)
+ src/bandersnatch_storage_plugins/swift.py: note: In member "write_bytes" of class "SwiftPath":
+ src/bandersnatch_storage_plugins/swift.py:408: error: Signature of "write_bytes" incompatible with supertype "Path"
+ src/bandersnatch_storage_plugins/swift.py:408: note: Superclass:
+ src/bandersnatch_storage_plugins/swift.py:408: note: def write_bytes(self, data: Union[bytes, Union[bytearray, memoryview, array[Any], mmap, _CData, PickleBuffer]]) -> int
+ src/bandersnatch_storage_plugins/swift.py:408: note: Subclass:
+ src/bandersnatch_storage_plugins/swift.py:408: note: def write_bytes(self, contents: bytes, encoding: Optional[str] = ..., errors: Optional[str] = ...) -> int
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Reviewers
srittau
srittau approved these changes
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|