GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Handle scalar `timeresp` in `solve_flat_ocp` by roryyorke · Pull Request #1111 · python-control/python-control Conversation
Contributor
Fixes gh-1110.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
|
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
coverage: 94.659% (+0.01%) from 94.649% |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| assert np.max(abs(r1.x-r2.x)) == 0 | ||
| assert np.max(abs(r1.u-r2.u)) == 0 | ||
| assert np.max(abs(r1.y-r2.y)) == 0 |
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a fancy way to say r1.x == r2.x while employing some opaque shape casting?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just laziness! fixed.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
the failures are during |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Reran the tests and that fixed the problem. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
solve_flat_ocp and scalar timepts
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.