GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Lint library code only with `ruff check` by roryyorke · Pull Request #1118 · python-control/python-control Conversation
Contributor
Make library code "Library code" is all non-test code in Besides making the other parts of the code pass lint, Partially addresses gh-1101. You can see an example of a failing Github Action ruff check here.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsMostly removing imports; in some cases, placate pyflakes with fake evaluation of not-obviously-used name.
|
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
coverage: 94.667% (+0.006%) from 94.661% |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
failure in "Conda-based pytest / Py3.12; conda Slycot; conda Pandas; conda CVXOPT ; QtAgg", in step possibly relevant parts there: |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Thanks for putting this together @roryyorke! These changes look good to me. I'll hold on merging in case others want to take a look, but will plan on merging in the next day or two. I'll create an issue to discuss the sporadically failing CI tests. Very annoying to have to re-run them and it seems to be increasing in frequency. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
pyflakes (pylint, ruff, ....) clean-up, CI?
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.