GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Test norm methods slycot and scipy separately by bnavigator · Pull Request #1201 · python-control/python-control

Conversation

@bnavigator

@bnavigator bnavigator commented Feb 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As brought out by #1200, the method switch for the norm computation can get lost. Let's parametrize and mark it properly.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@coveralls

coveralls commented Feb 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

coverage: 94.763% (+0.03%) from 94.734%
when pulling e3bfe9d on bnavigator:test-norm-methods
into 854f5f7 on python-control:main.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@murrayrm

murrayrm commented Feb 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The CI errors are due to a new version of NumPy. Fixes in in PR #1190 (commit cde5cbf).

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

bnavigator added 3 commits February 15, 2026 18:02
@bnavigator
test norm methods
8d20519
@bnavigator
mark slycot needing tests
a7a98a0
@bnavigator
test some invalid parameters
e3bfe9d
@bnavigator
bnavigator force-pushed the test-norm-methods branch from 7204aa2 to e3bfe9d Compare February 15, 2026 17:03
@murrayrm

murrayrm commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is ready to be merged as soon as we get the CI tests passing. May need to wait until #1219 is merged and then rebase.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@bnavigator @coveralls @murrayrm
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.