GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — use __call__ instead of evalfr in lti system classes by sawyerbfuller · Pull Request #449 · python-control/python-control Conversation
|
|
@bnavigator any idea how soon #438 will be ready for prime time? I can plan to try to merge (and figure out how to do that) when you’re done with the PR. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Hi, I think it is ready. But it depends on the yet unmerged PRs mentioned in the initial post. We should get those approved and merged first. I understand #438 is hard to review. The diff will get smaller with the underlying PRs though. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Coverage decreased (-0.07%) to 87.438% when pulling a631098 on sawyerbfuller:call-method into 4103688 on python-control:master. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
A few comments: |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please keep the numpydoc style
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
more numpydoc
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Ben Greiner <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ben Greiner <[email protected]>
doc fix Co-authored-by: Ben Greiner <[email protected]>
suggested doctoring fix for statesspace.slycot_horner Co-authored-by: Ben Greiner <[email protected]>
doctoring fixes to adhere to numpydoc convention Co-authored-by: Ben Greiner <[email protected]>
…and doing fallback
|
most recent commit moves the task of calling slycot and fall-back if it doesn't work into |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Ben Greiner <[email protected]>
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Ben Greiner <[email protected]>
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
ok I think ive resolved doc comments with the last two commits Travis isnt happy about somethng though. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Build 940 and 941 got canceled and 942 didn't start yet. We have to wait a little. And the day when we can ditch Travis for a different CI will be a happy day for me. (Working on Github Actions for Slycot right now in python-control/Slycot#140, and then I will tackle #446) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Ok looks like Travis is happy now. I’m happy to have it merged but don’t understand the various options, happy to leave it to @murrayrm and @bnavigator discretion. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
lti.evalfr and sys._evalfr have different behavior
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.