GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [pyos][checklist] Add link to comparison with `pygraphblas` in README · Issue #438 · python-graphblas/python-graphblas

[pyos][checklist] Add link to comparison with pygraphblas in README #438

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
#439
Closed
[pyos][checklist] Add link to comparison with pygraphblas in README#438
#439
Copy link
Labels
documentationImprove or add to documentationImprove or add to documentation

Description

@sneakers-the-rat
sneakers-the-rat
opened on Apr 17, 2023
Issue body actions

The review checklist asks me to affirm there is a comparison to similar packages in the ecosystem in the README. I think that could be as simple as linking to https://python-graphblas.readthedocs.io/en/stable/getting_started/faq.html#what-is-the-relationship-between-python-graphblas-and-pygraphblas

Close this if you have already done that, I just looked and didn't see it, but i just scanned really briefly.

Part of: pyOpenSci/software-submission#81

Activity

  1. eriknw
    added
    documentationImprove or add to documentationImprove or add to documentation
    on Apr 18, 2023
  2. eriknw commented on Apr 18, 2023

    @eriknw
    eriknw
    on Apr 18, 2023
    Member
    More actions

    I added a link to the FAQ to the README, which I think should be sufficient and I would argue is more useful (especially as we get more questions 😉 ) than using valuable space (and attention) to discuss a defunct package.

    Reacted by Sultan Orazbayev and Jonny Saunders
  3. eriknw commented on Apr 18, 2023

    @eriknw
    eriknw
    on Apr 18, 2023
    Member
    More actions

    Regarding "comparing to similar packages in the ecosystem", I think it would actually be informative to compare to e.g. scipy.sparse, networkx, and igraph. I think such a comparison could go in the README and/or documentation.

  4. SultanOrazbayev
    added a commit that references this issue on Apr 19, 2023

    Update README.md

    a3e60c6
  5. eriknw
    closed this as completedin #439on Apr 19, 2023
  6. sneakers-the-rat commented on Apr 27, 2023

    @sneakers-the-rat
    sneakers-the-rat
    on Apr 27, 2023
    Author
    More actions

    Good with both of those :)

  7. jim22k
    added a commit that references this issue on Jul 5, 2023

    Update README.md (#442)

    e3118da
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprove or add to documentationImprove or add to documentation

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.