GeezerVison

@adamjacobmuller Appreciate the great work here. The newer firmwares have a new flag in the device discovery process called new_klap. I created a PR already that uses this flag to determine the correct transport to use during the discovery process instead of modifying the transports themselves, PR#1580.

Your method, while it works, mixes the authentication process between the two different KLAP transports and it doesn't keep a clean line of separation between them.

I just finished it recently, had to handle some issues with the CLI and making sure that all of the other devices and tests worked correctly. Just waiting on merging and a new version to get it going.

Confirmed Working ✅

Just tested this PR on two HS300 power strips that were previously failing with the "Device response did not match our challenge" error.

Environment:

• HS300 (US) Hardware v2.0
• Firmware 1.1.2 Build 241220
• macOS / Python 3.14

Before this PR: Authentication failed with KLAP v1 (md5)
After this PR: Both strips connect and all 12 outlets are controllable

Test Results:

192.168.0.120: ✓ SUCCESS! TP-LINK_Power Strip_1C73 (HS300)
  Outlets: Coffee Maker, Kettle, Milk Frother, Roku TV, Apple Player, Rice Cooker

192.168.0.219: ✓ SUCCESS! TP-LINK_Power Strip_1CD6 (HS300)
  Outlets: Tripod Lamp, Plug 2-6

The auto-detection of KLAP v2 worked seamlessly. Really appreciate this fix - these strips have been unusable with Home Assistant since the October firmware update.

Hope this helps get the PR merged! 🎉

HS300 was exactly what I built this for (nice little gadget). Hoping it gets merged too, but, it works fine for me either way :)

This doesn't seem working for my HS300s; connection succeeds, but the device class is wrongly set as kasa.iot.iotplug.IotPlug instead of kasa.iot.iotstrip.IotStrip. Because of this, I'm unable to control sockets on the power strip from a script (device.children is an empty list)

model: HS300(US)
build: 241220
on nixOS linux with Python 3.13.12

My test script:

import asyncio
import kasa

async def main():
    dev = await kasa.Device.connect(
        config=kasa.DeviceConfig(
            host=input("host? "),
            credentials=kasa.Credentials(
                username="[email protected]",
                password="xxx",
            ),
            connection_type=kasa.DeviceConnectionParameters(
                device_family=kasa.DeviceFamily.IotSmartPlugSwitch,
                encryption_type=kasa.DeviceEncryptionType.Klap,
            ),
        )
    )
    await dev.update()
    print(f"children: {dev.children}")
    await dev.disconnect()

if __name__ == "__main__":
    asyncio.run(main())

Please let me know if I can provide any more information or am doing something wrong; I'm not very familiar with python-kasa and am just looking to get this working for a larger project.

I've created a fork that patches the issue for me by detecting device type through sys_info for KLAP connections (where this was only previously done on connections using the XOR transport). I don't expect this to be an accepted solution, but it solved the issue for me and may be of some use:
adamjacobmuller@97cdd71

Hey @adamjacobmuller — appreciate the work here, this was one of the first PRs to tackle the IOT KLAPv2 auth issue and confirmed it's a real problem affecting many users. 🙏

That said, #1692 takes a cleaner approach — it selects upfront in based on rather than falling back at runtime inside the handshake. This avoids mixing v1/v2 auth logic inside and keeps the transport boundary clean (as @ZeliardM also noted).

#1692 also fixes the device class misdetection that @2myaus reported here — HS300 strips wrongly instantiated as with empty . That fix requires the sysinfo query path change in which this PR doesn't cover.

Would you be open to closing this in favor of #1692? Both solve the core auth problem, but 1692 handles the broader set of regressions with tests included. 🤝

There is already an existing, extensively tested PR that handles all of the CLI and API changes, #1580, we are working to get this implemented and a new version released soon.

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request recently. This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because of that and will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days.
If you are the author of this PR, please leave a comment if you want to keep it open. Also, please rebase your PR onto the latest dev branch to ensure that it's up to date with the latest changes.
Thank you for your contribution!