GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [WIP] handling ByRef arguments for method overloading - update methodbinder.cs by den-run-ai · Pull Request #227 · pythonnet/pythonnet

Conversation

@den-run-ai

@den-run-ai den-run-ai commented Jun 8, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

byref handling:

#226

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
denfromufa
Update methodbinder.cs
76ca2d1
byref handling
@den-run-ai den-run-ai mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2016
Failure in function selection according to parameters #226
Closed
@den-run-ai

den-run-ai commented Jun 8, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

TODO: take care of out parameters also

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@den-run-ai

den-run-ai commented Jun 13, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

grab the wheels from this place (navigate to specific python version and then artifacts tab):

https://ci.appveyor.com/project/denfromufa/pythonnet/build/1.0.78

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@stonebig

stonebig commented Jun 22, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

will there be a maintenance release soon ?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@den-run-ai

den-run-ai commented Jun 22, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@stonebig I just asked @tonyroberts what are the plans with pull requests and have not received any reply yet.

in the meantime I mirrored pythonnet on bitbucket in case I have to fix the CI and merge pull requests faster:

https://bitbucket.org/pythonnet/pythonnet

vmuriart reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@tonyroberts

tonyroberts commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Any plans for any tests for this PR? The title is still WIP but am I to take it that it no longer is from your comments?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@tonyroberts

tonyroberts commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@denfromufa Expecting a reply immediately from someone in a different time zone is unreasonable. If you want PRs to be merged in a timely fashion please ensure they include any relevant tests and are clearly explained. Labeling one as work in progress and then using it for a long discussion thread involving TODOs doesn't make it easy to determine when the right time to merge it is.

@stonebig happy to do a maintenance release once these fixes are in. Looks like there are some problems currently on the mono side though, so those might have to be addressed first.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@den-run-ai

den-run-ai commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

My comments were in general for all PRs. There were some requests before
from other users that were not replied. I can send you the link(s) if you
think that you missed them.

I'm going to add tests to this pull request.

On Thursday, June 23, 2016, Tony Roberts [email protected] wrote:

@denfromufa https://github.com/denfromufa Expecting a reply immediately
from someone in a different time zone is unreasonable. If you want PRs to
be merged in a timely fashion please ensure they include any relevant tests
and are clearly explained. Labeling one as work in progress and then using
it for a long discussion thread involving TODOs doesn't make it easy to
determine when the right time to merge it is.

@stonebig https://github.com/stonebig happy to do a maintenance release
once these fixes are in. Looks like there are some problems currently on
the mono side though, so those might have to be addressed first.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#227 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AHgZ5XTZ1rF11rkEaHFtr2ZO-hh8axATks5qOlJUgaJpZM4IxJAU
.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@tonyroberts

tonyroberts commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@denfromufa in order to close the PRs this morning I had to go through cherry-picking various commits out of them, amending changes because of improper formatting, and subsequently fixing bugs introduced due to a lack proper care and attention when submitting the PRs. Most of these had comments on them indicating that there were problems with them. In other open source projects, they would simply have been rejected but I took the time to fix them up and get them into the project.

In the future, if you want PRs to be merged more quickly you may take it upon yourself to clean them up (code formatting, merge-commits that shouldn't be there etc.). If the merge is trivial and there is a decent explanation of what it is, and the code looks clean (and tested) I have no issue merging them immediately. If I have to spend time going through them and fixing them up then they will sit there until either they get closed or I have time to do it myself.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@den-run-ai

den-run-ai commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tonyroberts thanks for doing this tedious work with cherry-picking! Does this preserve the authors in the commits, i.e. will the authors of these original commits be listed in contributors to pythonnet?

https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/graphs/contributors

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@tonyroberts

tonyroberts commented Jun 23, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:37 PM denfromufa [email protected] wrote:

@tonyroberts https://github.com/tonyroberts thanks for doing this
tedious work with cherry-picking! Does this preserve the authors in the
commits, i.e. will the authors of these original commits be listed in
contributors to pythonnet?

https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/graphs/contributors

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#227 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ADDVi5Y_vOnCXed2JIq1EJ6s6ozDL-tDks5qOn3sgaJpZM4IxJAU
.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@den-run-ai den-run-ai self-assigned this Jun 24, 2016
@den-run-ai den-run-ai mentioned this pull request Jun 29, 2016
Type conversion changes between 2.1.0dev and 2.1.0 #236
Closed
@den-run-ai den-run-ai mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2016
meta-issue: overloading improvements #265
Closed
9 tasks
@filmor

filmor commented Aug 30, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@denfromufa Is this one still relevant?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@filmor filmor added the WIP label Oct 18, 2018
This was referenced Feb 24, 2019
No way of Invoking a generic method with multiple overload and out/byref parameters #641
Open
Cannot get correct overload of generic method #821
Open
@filmor filmor closed this Apr 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

@den-run-ai den-run-ai

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

4 participants

@den-run-ai @stonebig @tonyroberts @filmor
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.