GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — [REQUEST] Custom OpenAI API URL · Issue #801 · simstudioai/sim

[REQUEST] Custom OpenAI API URL #801

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Open
Open
[REQUEST] Custom OpenAI API URL#801
Copy link
Labels
featureNew feature or requestNew feature or request

Description

@racerxdl
racerxdl
opened on Jul 27, 2025
Issue body actions

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Currently we're locked in to specific models and we can't even set a custom API url making it unable to use llama-swap, llama-server or even ollama in OpenAI Compatibility mode.

Describe the solution you'd like
Add a model listing almost like the Azure/* that allows to write any model name, a custom API URL and a custom token. Internally, it would process as same the OpenAI / Azure client.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Azure/* sort of works, but I have to declare the name of my models as the same as azure has which is not great, since, for example, in llama-swap I can declare whatever name I want.

Reacted by Aptronym, xain, MonoBit, bobbythomas, xhzkp, alfredwallace7, Martin Yankov, Sérgio Rebelo, Simon Oakes, Ludovic Favre and 5 more

Activity

  1. racerxdl
    added
    featureNew feature or requestNew feature or request
    on Jul 27, 2025

  2. Aptronymist commented on Aug 1, 2025

    @Aptronymist
    Aptronymist
    on Aug 1, 2025
    More actions

    Agreed. Having an OpenAI compatibile option is essential.

    Reacted by bobbythomas, Sérgio Rebelo, Simon Oakes, Ludovic Favre and Samuel

  3. bobbythomas commented on Aug 29, 2025

    @bobbythomas
    bobbythomas
    on Aug 29, 2025
    More actions

    Absolutely agree. I'd love an OpenAI API compatible option where we can define any OpenAI compatible provider.

  4. xhzkp commented on Aug 30, 2025

    @xhzkp
    xhzkp
    on Aug 30, 2025
    More actions

    Absolutely agree!!!

  5. fludo commented on Oct 3, 2025

    @fludo
    fludo
    on Oct 3, 2025
    More actions

    +1, seems essential

  6. ksev548 commented on Dec 16, 2025

    @ksev548
    ksev548
    on Dec 16, 2025
    More actions

    +1 and it will allow to close multiple issues at once because this request is contained in more than one. Thank you !

  7. ghengx commented on Feb 6, 2026

    @ghengx
    ghengx
    on Feb 6, 2026
    More actions

    +1, Please have this to connect different LLM!

  8. fludo commented on Feb 6, 2026

    @fludo
    fludo
    on Feb 6, 2026
    More actions

    +1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    featureNew feature or requestNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions
      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.