GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — feat(comparisons): add code-sandbox and session-policy rows by waleedlatif1 · Pull Request #6517 · simstudioai/sim

Conversation

@waleedlatif1

@waleedlatif1 waleedlatif1 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Add two comparison rows — codeSandboxRuntime (configurable code sandboxes) and sessionPolicy (custom session policy) — populated for Sim and all 20 competitor profiles
  • Source Sim's facts from docs.sim.ai rather than the codebase, and repoint the execution-limits row at the Run Time Limits table (Enterprise async configurable up to 7 days)
  • Add configurable-workspace-sandboxes and org-session-policies to the feature catalog, and refresh the stale sandboxed-code-execution entry (E2B or Daytona, Function base image)

Type of Change

  • New feature

Testing

Type-check and biome clean. Every fact was researched against live vendor documentation, then independently re-verified by a second pass that fetched each cited URL, confirmed it substantiates the specific claim, and searched for contradicting evidence in both directions.

Notable corrections caught by that second pass:

  • CrewAI's sandbox claim rested on CodeInterpreterTool, which was removed from crewai-tools (PR improvement(emails): align transactional emails with the platform neutral design system #5309, 2026-04-07; CERT/CC VU#221883)
  • LangChain cited the private-preview announcement for a feature that went GA in May 2026
  • Retool's detail listed preloaded Python packages that the cited page never enumerates, and rested a de-gating claim on a community forum post
  • Vellum quoted marketing copy as documentation
  • Three of Sim's own claims were overstated: prebuilt-image install cost is sim.ai-scoped (self-hosted Daytona installs per run), SANDBOXES_ENABLED alone does not enable sandboxes, and import-free JavaScript ignores the sandbox selection entirely. A 10 MB request-body cap not supported by either cited page was removed from the execution-limits row.

Notes for review

Facts whose value begins Yes:/No: render as a bare icon and discard shortValue. Conditional capabilities (self-hosted only, package-layer only, tier-gated, delegated to another product layer) therefore use the dataset's existing Partial: convention so the qualifier survives into the rendered table, and negatives established only by absence use Not publicly documented:. This removes unearned checkmarks and unearned crosses alike.

Checklist

  • Code follows project style guidelines
  • Self-reviewed my changes
  • Tests added/updated and passing
  • No new warnings introduced
  • I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms outlined in the Contributor License Agreement (CLA)

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
greptile-apps[bot] reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction
@waleedlatif1
feat(comparisons): add code-sandbox and session-policy rows
24848f4 
Add two comparison rows covering configurable code sandboxes and
admin-configurable session policy, populated for Sim and all 20
competitor profiles. Source Sim's facts from the docs rather than the
codebase, and repoint the execution-limits row at the Run Time Limits
table.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
docs Skipped Skipped Aug 11, 2026 1:24am

Request Review
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
Changes are static comparison and catalog content only; no application execution or auth logic is modified in this diff.

Overview
Expands the landing comparisons dataset with two new dimensions: Configurable code sandboxes (codeSandboxRuntime) under Integrations and Custom session policy (sessionPolicy) under Security & compliance, wired through comparison-sections.ts and the compare types.

Each of Sim’s 20 competitor profiles (plus sim.ts) now carries sourced Fact entries for both keys, using Partial: / not publicly documented phrasing where capabilities are tier-gated, self-hosted-only, or absent so the UI keeps qualifiers instead of bare checkmarks.

The feature catalog adds org session policies and configurable workspace sandboxes, and refreshes sandboxed code execution (E2B or Daytona, Function base image). Sim’s own compare facts for sandboxes and session policies are aligned to docs.sim.ai; execution time limits cite the Run time limits docs (Enterprise async up to 7 days). Several competitors get corrected or expanded custom code step facts (e.g. Retool, Tines, Workato).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit a3a39f4. Configure here.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Greptile Summary

This PR extends the comparison dataset with configurable code-sandbox and session-policy coverage for Sim and all supported competitors.

  • Registers the two new rows in the typed comparison sections and profile schema.
  • Adds corresponding facts and sources across Sim and 20 competitor profiles.
  • Adds related feature-catalog entries and refreshes Sim’s sandbox and execution-limit claims.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge because no blocking failure remains.

No blocking failure remains.

Important Files Changed
Filename Overview
apps/sim/lib/compare/data/types.ts Adds required typed facts for configurable sandbox runtimes and session policies.
apps/sim/app/(landing)/comparisons/comparison-sections.ts Registers both new fact keys in their matching security and integrations sections.
apps/sim/lib/compare/data/sim.ts Adds sourced Sim facts for sandbox configuration and organization session policies while updating execution-limit sourcing.
apps/sim/lib/compare/data/feature-catalog.ts Adds the corresponding feature-catalog records and refreshes the sandboxed-execution entry.
apps/sim/lib/compare/data/competitors/crewai.ts Adds sourced CrewAI assessments for sandbox-runtime configuration and session-policy support.
apps/sim/lib/compare/data/competitors/langchain.ts Adds sourced LangChain assessments covering LangSmith sandboxes and self-hosted session controls.

Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "fix(comparisons): resolve customCodeStep..." | Re-trigger Greptile
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
cursor[bot]
cursor Bot reviewed Aug 11, 2026
View reviewed changes
Comment thread apps/sim/lib/compare/data/competitors/retool.ts Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Comment thread apps/sim/lib/compare/data/competitors/workato.ts Resolved

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@waleedlatif1
fix(comparisons): resolve customCodeSteps contradictions for Retool a…
a3a39f4 
…nd Workato

Both profiles documented code steps in the new codeSandboxRuntime row
while their adjacent customCodeSteps row still read Unknown/unclear,
so the rendered table gave contradictory answers for the same
capability. Settle both from the vendor docs already cited by the
sandbox row.
@vercel
vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview August 11, 2026 01:24 Inactive
@waleedlatif1

waleedlatif1 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@greptile
greptile-apps[bot] reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@waleedlatif1

waleedlatif1 commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@cursor review
cursor[bot] reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
cursor[bot]
cursor Bot reviewed Aug 11, 2026
View reviewed changes

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Bugbot reviewed your changes and found no new issues!

Comment @cursor review or bugbot run to trigger another review on this PR

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit a3a39f4. Configure here.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@waleedlatif1
waleedlatif1 merged commit c5db403 into staging Aug 11, 2026
30 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@waleedlatif1
waleedlatif1 deleted the feat/comparison-page-refresh branch August 11, 2026 01:30
This was referenced Aug 11, 2026
fix(comparisons): make sandbox and session-policy rows binary #6524
Closed
v0.8.0: new workflow UI, v2 API, salesforce JWT, provenance improvements, incidentio tools, block retries #6533
Closed
v0.8.0: desktop app, workflow UI, v2 endpoints #6606
Merged

This branch was previously deployed

1 inactive deployment
Preview — a3a39f47 Deployed Aug 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
View deployment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@cursor cursor[bot] cursor[bot] left review comments

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@waleedlatif1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.