GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — fix(import): reject servers that fail config validation before persisting (RC4-IMPORT-001) by Dumbris · Pull Request #1490 · smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go Conversation
Member
Pull RequestDescriptionFixes RC4-IMPORT-001, from the codex QA of v0.70.0-rc.4. The bug also exists in rc.2. A malformed import was accepted and persisted, and then bricked the next startup. The trigger was a URL-only entry imported with a forced
Fix
Testing
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions…ting POST /api/v1/servers/import with a URL-only entry forced through the claude-desktop format mapped to a commandless stdio server, which was persisted (notably with skip_quarantine=true) and made the next core startup exit with code 4 (command is required for stdio protocol). configimport.Import, the single choke point behind REST import and the CLI upstream import (daemon and direct config-file mode), now runs the same per-server checks config.Load applies (new config.ValidateServerForLoad) and reports failing entries as Failed (invalid_server, with the reason) instead of offering them for persistence. Valid entries in the same payload import as before. configimport validates each server under its pre-rename name; the REST import then applies the caller's rename map. Re-run the boot-path validation after renaming so a rename to a name the next startup refuses (e.g. containing ':') fails the entry instead of persisting it. From the zcode review of RC4-IMPORT-001.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Approved (Model B): Paperclip review verdicts = ACCEPT and qa-gate green at this head SHA. Arming auto-merge; GitHub merges when all required checks pass.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||
| You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |